Feb 3, 2007

The Matte Aesthetic

One of the nice attributes of digital photography is that it allows for one to do their own printing. Of course, this can get out of hand, as I described in my post about being a perfectionist. Nonetheless, the advent of high quality inkjet printers and image editing software has now given us unprecedented control over the appearance of our images, perhaps even more so than the wet darkroom.

Once an image has reached the stage where it is ready to be printed, the first decision that has to be made is….printed on what. Assuming that the answer, as it will likely be in 99% of cases, is printed on paper, then the obvious question is……what paper? And that is where the fun begins.

First, let me back up a bit. I print with an Epson 7600 Ultrachrome printer. The 7600 uses separate types of black ink for optimal printing on matte paper on the one hand and semi-gloss to glossy paper on the other. Unfortunately, at any one time, the printer can only be loaded with one of these two types of black ink. While it is theoretically possible to change over from one to the other, it is quite a hassle to do so, and also results in wasting a significant volume of rather expensive ink. For all intents and purposes, from a practical standpoint, when I got the printer I needed to make a decision as to whether I wanted the vast majority of my prints to be on matte or glossy paper.

I chose matte. I like the matte aesthetic. Without question, the semi-gloss to glossy paper alternative is equally valid. But matte paper has, for me, very appealing attributes. The image tends to take on a very ‘painterly’ appearance that looks quite unlike a traditional photograph. Of course, there is nothing ‘wrong’ with a traditional photograph; after all, we are ‘photographers’. However, to me, the aesthetic of matte paper seems to give the image a rather unique quality that sets it apart, in a positive way, from the images we are used to seeing on a daily basis.

There are a whole host of different types of matte papers available, ranging from bright white (using optical brighteners) to more natural colored rag papers and even papers with a slightly creamy underlying tint. Personally, I tend to use a slightly creamy paper for images where I want to impart a bit of a warm tone, such as images involving autumn color. In images where I want to maximize contrast I will use either a natural toned or very white paper, as the picture’s whitest white can only be as bright as the underlying paper the image is printed on.

Beyond the visual, however, there is something else even more ephemeral. Tactile sensation. A factor that I find as important as the paper color and brightness is the paper’s thickness and texture. There is something very satisfying about holding a photograph printed on heavyweight paper in one’s hands. There is a certain feeling of ‘permanence’ it seems to impart to the image. The choice of smooth versus textured paper also effects the tactile sensation of viewing the print. In effect, looking at the print starts to move beyond a purely visual experience and becomes one that also involves the sense of feel. It is unfortunate that a good deal of this aspect of the image is lost when the print is matted and framed under glass. Even then, though, the paper texture still has an effect on the visual appearance of the image.

To be sure, there are some downsides to printing on matte paper. Because of the way ink is absorbed onto the paper, images on matte paper, while sharp, are generally not as ‘razor’ sharp as those on glossy paper. Likewise, the saturation, or, for lack of a better word, the brilliance or contrast of an image is higher on glossy paper. Because of the lower contrast appearance on matte paper I do find it somewhat more difficult to get an optimal softproofing in image editing software and often have to use curves to increase the contrast more than I had anticipated. However, I personally feel that the gain in contrast tends to benefit the image more than a very slight loss in highlight or shadow detail, at least in most images. Finally, I do very little ‘people photography’, but do tend to like the appearance of portraits a bit more on semi-gloss or glossy paper.

It is certainly a matter of personal opinion, but I find that the aesthetic of matte paper is one that has a great deal of appeal to me.

6 comments:

Billie Mercer said...

I'm with you. I consider the paper a factor in the way I print my images. And that really hasn't changed for photographers with digital printing. When we were printing in the darkroom, the surface, the color, the weight, the silver content made a difference to us. We studied and compared to find the right "paper" for our work and moaned and stored paper supplies when a paper was discontinued. Just another one of those details in our process that we become obsessive about. You know we are a little crazy. LOL

Gary Nylander said...

After years of printing in a darkroom on silver glossy paper, I am now mostly printing on matte paper with a Epson 4800 and I like it !, it has a different look for sure, its nice to have a change once in a while.

Gary

Howard Grill said...

Hi Gary.

I enjoyed taking a look at the beautiful images on your website and blog. I see that most of your images are black and white. Up until this point, I have been printing essentially exclusively in color. I have been contemplating trying to do some black and white printing and was wondering what they would look like on matte paper since I really didn't want to change the printer over to photo black. I was excited that there are some new papers directed toward black and white printing that have recently come out, but was a bit dissappointed to see that they also require photo black ink for optimal results.

So, if I were to start to try black and white on the 7600 I would probably begin with something like Hahnemuhle Phot Rag. I am just curious what paper you are using for black and white....is it one that allows for the use of matte black ink? I believe the 4800 can use both at once, which the 7600 can't do.

Billie Mercer said...

Howard,
I use the Quadtone RIP shareware for printing B&W on matte paper with an Epson 4000 and I'm pretty happy with the results. Smoother ramp of tones in my opinion.

Howard Grill said...

Billie,

I have the ImagePrint RIP, which I guess performs more or less the same purpose, though I jave heard that Quadtone is more custumizable...but I am pretty unknowledgable about linearization, ink limitation and those sorts of things. I haven't given B&W a whirl yet with the RIP...something I am looking forward to playing with.

Mark said...

I also use matte papers for many of the same reasons. (I use an Epson 4800 - which still requires ink switching, unlike the 4000)

If Epson didn't force x800 users into this situation again, I don't think they would see so many considering switching now to HP or Canon.

There are a lot of times where I wish I could print both surfaces and choose which I like best - but it isn't financially practical. RC papers are also going to offer a greater color gamut.

On the other hand, RC papers have issues with off-gassing, and matte papers do not.

I sometimes just want a printing process that is easy! :)